Summary:
X-link: facebook/react-native#41019

### Changes made
- Regenerated tests (as some aspect ratio tests seem to be out of date compared to the fixtures)
- Added SpaceEvenly variant to the "Align" enums (via enums.py)
- Implemented `align-content: space-evenly` alignment in CalculateLayout.cpp
- Added generated tests `align-content: space-evenly`
- Updated NumericBitfield test to account for the fact that the Align enum now requires more bits (this bit could do with being reviewed as I am not 100% certain that it's valid to just update the test like this).

### Changes not made
- Any attempt to improve the spec-compliance of content alignment in general (e.g. I think facebook/yoga#1013 probably still needs to happen)

X-link: facebook/yoga#1422

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D50305438

Pulled By: NickGerleman

fbshipit-source-id: ef9f6f14220a0db066bc30db8dd690a4a82a0b00

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #41019

### Changes made
- Regenerated tests (as some aspect ratio tests seem to be out of date compared to the fixtures)
- Added SpaceEvenly variant to the "Align" enums (via enums.py)
- Implemented `align-content: space-evenly` alignment in CalculateLayout.cpp
- Added generated tests `align-content: space-evenly`
- Updated NumericBitfield test to account for the fact that the Align enum now requires more bits (this bit could do with being reviewed as I am not 100% certain that it's valid to just update the test like this).

### Changes not made
- Any attempt to improve the spec-compliance of content alignment in general (e.g. I think facebook/yoga#1013 probably still needs to happen)

X-link: facebook/yoga#1422

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D50305438

Pulled By: NickGerleman

fbshipit-source-id: ef9f6f14220a0db066bc30db8dd690a4a82a0b00

Summary:
X-link: facebook/react-native#41019

### Changes made
- Regenerated tests (as some aspect ratio tests seem to be out of date compared to the fixtures)
- Added SpaceEvenly variant to the "Align" enums (via enums.py)
- Implemented `align-content: space-evenly` alignment in CalculateLayout.cpp
- Added generated tests `align-content: space-evenly`
- Updated NumericBitfield test to account for the fact that the Align enum now requires more bits (this bit could do with being reviewed as I am not 100% certain that it's valid to just update the test like this).

### Changes not made
- Any attempt to improve the spec-compliance of content alignment in general (e.g. I think #1013 probably still needs to happen)

Pull Request resolved: #1422

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D50305438

Pulled By: NickGerleman

fbshipit-source-id: ef9f6f14220a0db066bc30db8dd690a4a82a0b00

Summary:
Fixes facebook#1300
Fixes facebook#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook#1491
2. facebook#1493
3. facebook#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Differential Revision: D52087013

…1513)

Summary:

X-link: facebook/react-native#41916

Fixes facebook#1300
Fixes facebook#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook#1491
2. facebook#1493
3. facebook#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Differential Revision: D52087013

…1513)

Summary:

X-link: facebook/react-native#41916

Fixes facebook#1300
Fixes facebook#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook#1491
2. facebook#1493
3. facebook#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Differential Revision: D52087013

…1513)

Summary:

X-link: facebook/react-native#41916

Fixes facebook#1300
Fixes facebook#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook#1491
2. facebook#1493
3. facebook#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Reviewed By: joevilches

Differential Revision: D52087013

…1513)

Summary:

X-link: facebook/react-native#41916

Fixes facebook#1300
Fixes facebook#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook#1491
2. facebook#1493
3. facebook#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Reviewed By: joevilches

Differential Revision: D52087013

…41916)

Summary:
X-link: facebook/yoga#1513


Fixes facebook/yoga#1300
Fixes facebook/yoga#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook/yoga#1491
2. facebook/yoga#1493
3. facebook/yoga#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Reviewed By: joevilches

Differential Revision: D52087013

Summary:
X-link: facebook/yoga#1513

X-link: facebook/react-native#41916

Fixes facebook/yoga#1300
Fixes facebook/yoga#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook/yoga#1491
2. facebook/yoga#1493
3. facebook/yoga#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Reviewed By: joevilches

Differential Revision: D52087013

fbshipit-source-id: 8d95ad17e58c1fec1cceab9756413d0b3bd4cd8f

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #1513

X-link: facebook/react-native#41916

Fixes #1300
Fixes #1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. #1491
2. #1493
3. #1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Reviewed By: joevilches

Differential Revision: D52087013

fbshipit-source-id: 8d95ad17e58c1fec1cceab9756413d0b3bd4cd8f

Summary:
X-link: facebook/yoga#1513

Pull Request resolved: #41916

Fixes facebook/yoga#1300
Fixes facebook/yoga#1008

This fixes a smattering of issues related to both sizing and aligment of multi-line-containers:

1. We were previously incorrectly bounding the size of each flex line to the min/max of the entire container.
2. Per-line leads were sometimes incorrectly contributing to alignment within the line
3. The cross dim size used for multi-line alignment is not correct, or correctly clamped. If the available size comes from a max constraint, that was incorrectly used instead of a definite size, or size of content. Leads were entirely skipped for min constraint.

Need to test how breaking this is, to see if it might need to go behind an errata.

See related PRs:
1. facebook/yoga#1491
2. facebook/yoga#1493
3. facebook/yoga#1013

Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fix Yoga sizing and alignment issues with multi-line containers

Reviewed By: joevilches

Differential Revision: D52087013

fbshipit-source-id: 8d95ad17e58c1fec1cceab9756413d0b3bd4cd8f

Summary:

### Changes made
- Regenerated tests (as some aspect ratio tests seem to be out of date compared to the fixtures)
- Added SpaceEvenly variant to the "Align" enums (via enums.py)
- Implemented `align-content: space-evenly` alignment in CalculateLayout.cpp
- Added generated tests `align-content: space-evenly`
- Updated NumericBitfield test to account for the fact that the Align enum now requires more bits (this bit could do with being reviewed as I am not 100% certain that it's valid to just update the test like this).

### Changes not made
- Any attempt to improve the spec-compliance of content alignment in general (e.g. I think facebook/yoga#1013 probably still needs to happen)

X-link: facebook/yoga#1422

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D50305438

Pulled By: NickGerleman